patching...
Update: Sign up for the Portsmouth Patch newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Shipyard Workers Looking at Long Furloughs

If sequestration goes into effect on March 1, thousands of union employees will begin several weeks of furloughs and the future of the USS Miami repair project will be in doubt.

 

Depending on what Congress ultimately chooses to do regarding sequestration, several thousand Portsmouth Naval Shipyard jobs hang in the balance.

Paul O'Connor, president of the Metal Trades Council at the shipyard which includes 2,500 union members, more than one-third of the shipyard's 6,500 work force, knows one thing that will definitely happen.

"We will have furloughs for 22 weeks, one day a week," said O'Connor. He added the furloughs will amount to the loss of a full month's pay for the union's members. He also said layoffs are a very real possibility if Congress doesn't come up with a solution for sequestration before the 22 weeks of furloughs ends.

Even more worrisome to O'Connor is that the shipyard's ability to service the Navy's Los Angeles class and Virginia class nuclear submarines will also suffer. He said the furloughs amount to a 20 percent cut in overall production during what would be a five-month period. O'Connor said the USS Miami repair project, which is a little more than half funded at about $250 million, could also become another casualty of sequestration because the remaining $200 million would not be appropriated. The USS Miami was heavily damaged by fire in May 2012.

Earlier this month, a U.S. Navy directive for shipyards to cut 10 percent of their expenses in fiscal year 2013 in anticipation of the mandated $1.2 trillion in sequestration cuts could put 3,000 shipyard jobs in jeopardy at all four of te Navy's shipyards, including 1,121 temporary jobs. The sequestration cuts are scheduled to go into effect on March 1, which means federal lawmakers have less than two more weeks to act.

On Thursday, shipyard officials were unable to say how many jobs would be cut if additional Department of Defense cuts go into effect. Shipyard public affairs officer Danna Eddy referred all inquiries to the U.S. Navy Chief of Information desk in Washington, D.C., and they did not return phone calls last week.

Meanwhile, U.S. Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, continue to work with their Senate colleagues to craft a solution to stop the potential hemorrhaging of jobs. They recently urged the Senate leadership to come up with a new balanced, bipartisan deficit reduction solution.

In their letter to Senate leaders Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Shaheen and Collins wrote that if the Senate fails to come up with a new deficit reduction plan that will head off $1.2 trillion in future sequestration cuts, this  “would have severe ramifications for many critical defense facilities, including our own Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.”

On Friday, Shaheen reaffirmed her promise to do everything she can to try and avert sequestration.

"We are starting to see the very real and negative consequences of Congressional inaction on our national security and our economy alike as businesses across the nation begin to prepare for automatic budget cuts under sequestration," said Shaheen in a prepared statement. "This is especially true at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, where the uncertainty surrounding sequestration is already straining our national security operations. I am committed to seeking pragmatic, bipartisan solutions to avoid the devastating impact of these cuts."

U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-NH, has also filed legislation designed to alleviate the defense spending cuts. According to Liz Johnson, who serves as Ayotte's press secretary, Ayotte reintroduced the Down Payment to Protect National Security Act of 2013.

If approved, the legislation would pay for one year of defense and non-defense sequestration by requiring a reduction in the federal workforce through attrition and a pay freeze for Members of Congress, according to Johnson.

"We’re already feeling the effects of sequestration in New Hampshire, where the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and our defense suppliers are bracing for these cuts," said Ayotte in a prepared statement. "We can prevent the first year of sequestration without raising taxes."

O'Connor said he is not optimistic that Congress will be able to avert sequestration because there is so little time left. "I have no confidence that somehow Congress will somehow start working together."

"The most frustrating thing about sequestration is that it was totally manufactured by Congress," O'Connor added.

Do you think members of the New Hampshire and Maine Congressional delegations can come up with a way to prevent Portsmouth Naval Shipyard jobs from being lost to sequestration by March 1?

  • Will Portsmouth Naval Shipyard jobs be saved from Sequestration?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        1 (16%)
    • No
        4 (66%)
    • Unsure
        1 (16%)
    Total votes: 6
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Across the river, Government, Jeanne Shaheen, Kittery, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Susan Collins, and furloughs

Don Armstrong

2:59 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

There will be Sequestration and the Republicans wil blame the Democrats. Today on the TV Paul Ryan said that "Last year we did all the tax increases we will do". From now on they just want cuts in the budget so don't be surprised if Portsmouth gets closed down via attrition and all of it's work goes elsewhere in the US.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

7:58 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The sequester was suggested by Obama and pushed by Obama. In fact, he threatened to veto and legislation that did away with it. The sequester is Obama's brilliant idea all the way. He kicked the can down the road and now it's coming back to bite him. As the saying goes......."The chickens have come home to roost."

Don Armstrong

10:19 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Congress had it's chance to create a budget and could not get anyplace so they created the super commitee which had an even number of Democrats and Republicans and they could not create any sort of a budget either. The Democrats want tax increases and elimination of tax loop holes and cutting of spending. The Republicans have stated "No tax increases and elimination of tax loop holes is considered to be a tax increase" but they do want to cut everything but defense. Obama created his own budget a long time ago and the Democrats said it had to many cuts and the Republicans said it did not have enough cuts and it could not have a single tax increase so both sides of the aisle shot it down. Obama can't sign into law any budget until both the House and Senate create their versions of the bill and a House Senate conferance marks it up and they both vote on the full bill and then it gets sent to the President to sign into law. In other words "Don't blame Obama". As was reported in other news media conservative Republicans in places like Utah have been told by their constituants to not give Obama a single thing and let the Sequestration happen. The trouble is they are all farmers in that part of the state and one of the items the Republicans want eliminated is all Farm Aid.

Reply

Proud Conservative

8:56 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

The4 Republican controlled House has passed several budgets over the past few years. Harry Reid refuses to let any of them come up for discussion in the Senate. Obama's budget proposal was sent to the Senate where it was voted down by every Democrat. The Democratically controlled Senate is where the budget has been killed since Obama took office.

Reply

Atlant Schmidt

9:44 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

What, exactly, are all of our Virginia-class ballistic missile submarines protecting us from these days?

Do we really expect a nuclear first strike from Russia or China anytime soon?

Maybe it's time to mothball most of the fleet of boomers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

2:40 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Maybe it is time to mothball most of the "big pile of entitlements" that are bankrupting our country. Maybe it is time to mothball "political parties" who think every problem can be solved with higher taxes and more fiscally irresponsible government programs. Oh, I could just keep going on and on and on....

Arthur Clough

2:40 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

My one hope is that from the sequester we might find operational inefficiencies. Unions are not about productivity they are about maximizing employee pay, benefits, and to some degree their safety. Unfortunately family members of mine have recounted to me of their union experience in which they were chastized for being "overproductive". We in the private sector have been dealing with improving our productivity over time. Ask yourself why Portsmouth's numbers of employees has grown as population shrinks and new tools with greater efficiency are invented are implemented. We need to clean up our public sector inefficiencies.
It's interesting to see the public sector having to deal with that which the private sector has been dealing since 2007. I get no satisfaction that peoples' salaries will be going down. We are starting to feel the same pain.
It's regrettable that in general the Democrats are so tied to government unions and expansion of governmental services that they were unwilling to jeopardize their voter base by taking a more active role in looking for cutting down on governmental inefficiencies. It's time for us to stop being so polarized about our respective partys' interests and understand that we have a large looming problem with our legacy debt, credit worthiness/inflationary risks, and abuse of public funds. We need to collectively wake up and understand that we competing against other countries and shouldn't be competing policitally. Divided we fail.

Reply

Leave a comment