NH Towns to Keep an Eye on Tuesday
UNH political science professor Dante Scala tells us which towns he sees as bellwethers for who New Hampshire will go for in the presidential election.
In every big election, there are towns prognosticators look to as indicators of how a particular state, or even the entire country, might vote. These bellwether towns can provide an early sign of what the final result is going to be.
We asked University of New Hampshire political science professor Dante Scala to tell us which Granite State towns he thinks will be bellwethers in Tuesday's presidential election between President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.
Working-class Rochester and other northern Strafford County towns like Farmington, Strafford and Northwood were among the ones he mentioned.
He also cited Seacoast communities like Hampton, North Hampton, Rye and Stratham as potential bellwethers, because they're a bit well-off, but still liberal on social issues.
"There are a lot of wealthy, prosperous people there, but they're more liberal on social issues maybe," Scala said.
He also considers Amherst, Milford and Hollis potential bellwether towns.
"They lean a little bit Republican, but not a lot," Scala said. "If Obama's winning places like that, he's probably having a decent night."
Bow is also a good place to look at, he said.
"It's a good microcosm of New Hampshire," Scala said. "One, it's a town; two, it's fairly prosperous. You find a lot of voters there that fit the type – economically well off, socially moderate to liberal."
Hurricane could help Obama
Scala said he thinks Hurricane Sandy helped Obama, and not just because it helped him look presidential.
"I think putting Romney off the front page for most of the week helps a bit," he said. "The national media is focusing more on the natural disaster. It's kind of a two-fer in that regard."
A toss-up? Not exactly
Asked how close he thinks the presidential race is in New Hampshire right now, Scala said he doesn't think it's a dead heat, as some media outlets are saying.
"Right now, I think it'll mirror the national results, but not quite," he said. "Right now, I think we've got a situation where nationally, it's roughly about even.
"In New Hampshire, I wouldn't classify the race as a toss-up right now. The polls consistently show a small lead for the president. I think that's where we're at. When you see half a dozen polls showing you the same thing, I don't think all of them can be attributed to margin of error. I think right now the Democrats have the upper hand, but not by a lot. Not like in '08. More like '04."
Romney was in Portsmouth yesterday, and will appear with Kid Rock at a rally in Manchester on Monday night. Obama and former President Bill Clinton are scheduled to appear in Concord today.
NEC poll has Obama out in front
Speaking of polls, one conducted last week by New England College showed President Obama leading Romney 49.5 percent to 44.4 percent. In the race for independent voters, the poll gave Obama a 49 percent to 39 percent edge.
The same poll has Republican incumbent Frank Guinta leading Democrat Carol Shea-Porter 48 percent to 41 percent in the 1st District Congressional race, and Democrat Annie Kuster leading incumbent Republican Charles Bass 47 percent to 41 percent in the 2nd District Congressional race.
Meanwhile, a new University of New Hampshire Survey Center poll released yesterday has Obama and Romney tied at 47 percent apiece. Obama was leading in the previous UNH poll.
The money race
In the governor's race, the Union Leader's John DiStaso reported last week that Democrat Maggie Hassan had raised $747,602 since the primary. She spent $681,944, leaving her with $65,658 on hand heading into the final days.
Republican Ovide Lamontagne, meanwhile, raised $743,531 since the primary and spent $564,156, leaving him with $179,375 on hand.
Strong turnout expected
DiStaso also asked Secretary of State William Gardner for his prediction on voter turnout on Election Day. Gardner said he thinks turnout will be around 70 percent, slightly more than it was in the 2008 presidential election.
Electrical workers take issue with Romney on FEMA
New Hampshire AFL-CIO President Mark MacKenzie will join electrical workers on a conference call tomorrow questioning Mitt Romney's position on disaster relief and federal emergency planning.
The workers are expected to focus their remarks on how state and federal agencies helped them respond to emergencies in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. They'll also hit Romney on his stated positions on disaster relief and abolishing FEMA.
Charles Hatch
7:33 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Obama Biden victory 2012
Mike Healey
9:52 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
I think its going to happen, lots of fake confidence despite the evidence on the other side.
David H. Mirsky
8:43 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Independent-minded voters have strong reasons to support President Obama this year - check out this link:
http://exeter.patch.com/blog_posts/why-i-choose-barack-obama-for-president-in-2012
Mike Healey
9:53 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
That is IF the challenger is a viable candidate.
Silencedogood
8:48 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Why would Libya-gate be swept so quickly from the main stream media and why would Romney not be more outspoken about the need for a Special Prosecutor? Could it be that both Obama and Romney are controlled by the same set of Masters and they are only interested in the sleeping masses to be constrained to either one of their two puppets? Waste your vote and Go Libertarian. Try Liberty for a Change!
Brian
7:59 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Fringe group: no chance.
Lori
9:37 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Romney has nothing to do with Libya-gate. The expression on his face was all he could do when he brought Libya up in the debate, add to that the look on Obama's face was just as telling. Guilty to the core
Mike Healey
9:39 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
What is Libya-gate?
Billnh
10:10 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
I think she means Libia. You know, that country in Afrika.
Silencedogood
11:02 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Lori - I sincerely believe that Romney had nothing to do with the Libya-gate. However, one would think in a normal electoral process in by-gone days back when the United States was governed by the rule of law, the challenger would at least call for an independent investigation or a Congressional investigation instead of simply permitting his Majesty to delay any further discussion on the topic until after the "election process is completed." The silence is truly deafening.
Judith Hogan
4:23 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
SDG - it would not do Romney any good to bring up Libya-gate. Obama would just obfuscate the issue and the press would back him up. It would be a lose/lose for Romney. However, Ayotte and McCain are pressing forward and you see how far that is getting them. It's a coverup. The press is on his side. It's a win/win for him to just keep dancing around the facts until after the election and there is nothing we can do about it. It is what it is - a coverup!
Hardy Har Har Har
11:23 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012
U should keep an eye on which state the cars are from at the voting stations.
Atlant Schmidt
8:56 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
So if a Massachusetts volunteer is driving New Hampshire voters to a polling station, you figure some sort of crime is being committed?
Brian
8:09 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Your name says it all: buffoon!
Watts
2:26 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
I have to wonder what any Romney voters are thinking. Who knows Romney better than anybody? How about the state who actually voted him in before, as Governor. So let's take a moment to look at how the only state who has any working knowledge about how Romney governs, is voting...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ma/massachusetts_romney_vs_obama-1804.html
The average of all polls, whether you believe some to be conservative or liberal leaning, still gives Obama a 20+ point lead. So my question is, why aren't more people paying attention to this? You can't shrug it off that it is MA and they always lean this way, because they voted Romney himself in as a Republican. The reality is that Romney can't even get close in this election in the only state that he has governed before, where the people actually know what you get if you vote for Romney. If he was the success that he pretends to be in MA, don't you think that he would be leading in MA or at the very least, have a close race going on there?
Hardy Har Har Har
2:33 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Hardy Har Har Har
Watts
4:13 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
@Hardy Har Har Har
I have to admit that I have no idea what your intent is with these posts; if they are meant to be laughing with me or at me, but I have to admit that either way...I think that your approach of redundant ID and post content is hysterical!
TonyM
4:49 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Obviously there are a lot of Obama lovers here. Ask yourselves this question; what has this racist done for any of you? You drink too much cool aid !
Ice
5:33 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Yes there are a lot of Obama lovers all over the U.S. so save your Kool Aid comments, doubtful they will be tolerated for long here....You Republicans are such hateful people really.
Obama 2012
Tony Schinella
5:06 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
@News Flash: Poynter says it's 21 newspapers: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/194160/wisconsin-state-journal-endorses-romney-latest-paper-to-flip-from-obama-in-08/
Jan Schmidt
5:52 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Obama leads in endorsements by the 100 largest newspapers (by circulation) in the U.S. right now by 35-29
Seamus Carty
9:26 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
How does that 35-29 lead compare to 2008? Old media loves liberal...
Seamus Carty
6:07 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
I found the answer. 33 papers that supported Obama in 2008 have endorsed Romney in 2012. Includes the liberal Cape Cod Times!
There are 3 papers that went with McCain in 2008 and are now endorsing Obama. One is the SF Examiner.
In swing states, it is Romney 24 - Obama 15. In NH, the Union Leader and the Nashua Telegraph have both endorsed Romney.
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/194160/wisconsin-state-journal-endorses-romney-latest-paper-to-flip-from-obama-in-08/
Mike Healey
6:20 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
There are 13,000 newspapers in America, and your big discovery is that .2% of the smallest papers changed their endorsements? Wow......
Of the largest papers the overwhelming majority endorsed the President.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/2012_newspaper_endorsements.php
Brian
8:13 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
And we all know how much a newspaper endorsement means. It winds up on the floor of the bird cage.
Ice
5:38 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
Major Newspapers are owned by large Corporations so of course they are going to support Romney, they are probably owned by the same guys that threatened their Employees to Vote for Romney otherwise they would be getting layed off...Imagine that? Dictating over your Employees who they should be voting for ? Sounds more like Communism to me.
Obama 2012
News Flash
7:09 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
21 Major Newspapers Switch To Romney
http://nation.foxnews.com/newspaper-endorsements/2012/11/04/eleven-major-newspapers-switch-romney-only-one-obama
Mike Healey
9:41 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Majority of Newspapers still support the President.
News Flash
9:57 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Only the ones going out of business.
Mike Healey
6:14 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Only the ones going out of business support Romney? Makes sense
Brian
8:17 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
FOXSNOOZE! Enough said.
David Victory
2:32 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Pew: Obama Re-Takes National Lead
President Obama has experienced a resurgence in the well-respected Pew poll of the national presidential election, building a 3-point lead as Tuesday approaches.
Obama pulled 50 percent of likely voters against Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s 47 percent, a 3-point bump for the president from Pew’s last poll a week ago, which showed the candidates tied at 47 percent.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/pew-obama-re-takes-national-lead.php
Obama 2012.
Mike Healey
9:42 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Mittmentum fell short....
Mike Healey
9:51 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Another well though out post, your quite the intellectual Scratchy.
News Flash
9:56 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
As if Healy has any thoughts at all.
Mike Healey
6:13 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
It helps if you can read Flashy
Mike black
6:16 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Gays support Obama 65%-35%
Mike Healey
9:44 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
Its just another reason why the President has been able to stay in the lead this whole election.
TonyM
8:36 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
All Obama has done is blow smoke up your a... He failed miserably and it is up to voters. Left wingers like you all are a lost cause. If there is ever a revolution you will be the first to go. Bank on it. You are no good for America!!
Mike Healey
9:42 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
You need to stop watch so much fake news.
News Flash
9:57 am on Monday, November 5, 2012
All Obama has done is failed. Name something that has not.
Mike Healey
6:12 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Turned the economy around
Lowered restriction on gun ownership
Killed Osama
Ended one war, ending the other.
Dropped unemployment over 2%
Saved the banks
Saved the stock market
Saved the auto industry
etc. etc. etc.
Seamus Carty
6:16 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012
Wow, I live in a bellwether town in a swing state... Thank God I don't live in some irrelevant place like Reading, MA...